A New Green History of the World by Clive Ponting, is the story of Easter Island, which is a prime example of the dependence of human communities on their environment and the devastating consequences of not giving back what they take from the environment. The first polynesian settlers came sometime in the fifth century and discovered quickly that the island contained a scarce amount of resources. The people were restricted to a small diet of sweet potatoes and chicken due to the climate which left them with an abundant amount of free time. Closely related households formed clans with a chief leader to distribute food and form activities and each had its own place for religious practices. The society became one the the most advanced and complex community in Polynesian history. As the population of humans grew, the lack of resources dwindled. Trees were cut down for agriculture purposes, fuel for heating and cooking, shelter construction, building canoes and for transporting elaborate stone statues across the island for religious clan purposes. As the trees disappeared, underground homes were having to be made, canoes were no longer available, and the crop growing soil became eroded and lacked nutrients. Clans began fighting over the reason for the lack of resources which led to a war break out. Lacking in protein, people resorted to cannibalism which led to extinction.
Planet Earth as a whole, faces similar problems as did the people of Easter Island, however we are now capable of reversing the damage humans have done. The Earth is slowly eliminating resources needed to survive due to unnecessary societal demands. People on Earth have no escape after resources run out like the people of Easter Island. For the luxury of living frivolously, humans are polluting the atmosphere/oceans and deforesting, which both then lead to animal extinction, soil erosion, contaminated water, all of which are vital means of survival. I believe we are able to reverse this epidemic if everyone on Earth gives back to their ecosystem more than they take from it. According to The Millennium Ecosystem Panel, the changes that have been made in the ecosystems have contributed to substantial net gains for the well being of humans and economic development. The achievements have been made only through the sacrifice of the degradation of many ecosystem services, increased risk of non linear change and increase of poverty. Unless these problems are addressed, they will substantially diminish the benefits that these ecosystems obtain for future generations.
According to www.ourcivilisation.com, air pollution has been falling in modern industrialized countries for the last 40 years, and it has been falling precisely because of economic growth and improvements in technology. Even in Los Angeles, which has the worst smog in the United States, air pollution levels have fallen by about half in the last 25 year and that is at a time when the area's population has doubled and its economy has tripled. I believe that this is a great counterargument to global warming, however I also believe that the statement shows that there was a problem but advanced technology has helped reverse potential harmful pollution.
Hi, Larissa;
ReplyDeleteYour blog is well written and clearly stated. You make a strong point that if we use up our resources today, the stakes are quite a bit higher than for the inhabitants of Easter Island. That is an interesting finding about pollution . . . it makes me wonder how they define pollution. Nice job!
Thank you!
ReplyDeleteLarissa, you did a really good job explaining both readings and applying new research into your blog. I completely agree with Dr. Armstrong about if we use up our resources today, we will run into major problems in the future. Do you know what technology has helped reverse potential pollution? Do you think that because sustainability has become a main focus in the design industry it has helped large cities from harmful pollution?
ReplyDeleteOlivia, the article did not say specifically how pollution had been reversed. They did not do a very good job at backing their argument. I am guessing because of the precautionary's that have been enforced, industry's are being forced to regulate the amount of gas emissions they produce and reduce the amount of harmful chemicals being used.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog! I agree with you, Larissa. I don't think it is hard to give a little back to in our community-simply recycling, replaying trees..whatever it may be; a little goes more than people think these days. I would have liked to have known what technology was used as well, too bad they left that out.. Great job, Larissa!
ReplyDeleteGood interaction, Larissa!
ReplyDelete