Through A Child's Eyes

Ghandi once said, "If we are to teach real peace in this world, and if we are to carry on a real war against war, we shall have to begin with the children."This quote inspired me to relate the education of environmental sustainability and what I have learned through the eyes of children.  I am a true believer that for a real change in the world to happen, we must thoroughly educate children about what the change is and have them start the change. A child's mind is like a ball of clay in which their brain will mold into whatever their surroundings tell them to be. They learn at a young age what to believe is right and what to believe is wrong. Many kid's, unfortunately, do not have good teachers and parents to educate them properly about what is true. Teaching children how to take care of the Earth from a very early age is vital for making the future a sustainable place to live. 


I am personally fascinated by children and they inspire me to be a better person when I see how their innocence is effected negatively by adults. Children have a wild and adventurous imagination that is usually in a positive sense. Imaginations tend to dwindle every year as a human grows older when they realize the world is not as great and promising as they once imagined it was. The dreams for the future that a child once had diminish as they are constantly told what they want is impossible or that they will never be good enough to accomplish their dream. When my 4 year old niece tells me that there are elephants and hippos in her back yard, I always go along with her story because what is the point of telling her that the fact that wild animals are in suburbia Kansas is impossible? By letting a child keep their imagination and teaching them optimism instead telling them what a pessimistic world we live in and this is just how the world is, there is no telling what ideas they will come up with for their future.


While reading Design Activism, I came up with the idea of having environmental sustainability a mandatory class every year for children in every grade. This would be a design activism cause of community enabling. Educating children about how to take care of the Earth and putting back what they take, starting in Kindergarten until they graduate high school, could lead to nothing but success. The concept would become part of their everyday life and would change how humans live on Earth. Manufacturing companies in the apparel industry would no longer use harmful chemicals and treat workers poorly because they would be better educated on how to properly design garments and take care of employees. Children see their future 100 times more positively than we see ours, yet adults are teaching children to see the future for what it really is now, instead of what it could be in the future. These children will not need to be activists, because what they know and what they believe about the environment will be reflected on their everyday lives and how they conduct business ethically as adults.  




This course has taught me the importance of taking care of the Earth and all the resources that it provides. My life has changed now that I am aware of the harmful effects I have caused and I hope to continue to improve my way of life and to teach others how to live a sustainable life. At the beginning of the semester, I did not realize what a positive impact this class would have on me and changing my life to become more healthy and eco friendly. I plan on continuing my research on how to be sustainable. I want to learn how companies are changing their plan to become Earth friendly and how the government is impacting this positive movement.

Upcycling for Organic Food

This past weekend, my mother came to visit me and brought me a lot of vegetable, fruit and herb plants to plant in large pots for my front and back porches. This reminded me of some of the readings I had researched about living a more sustainable life and I realized that by growing and eating what these organic plants had to offer, I was already making a positive difference for my body and the Earth. I always use burlap material to line a planter to keep in moisture and my mom says the airy cloth helps the plant grow better. This gave me my idea for using fibers that are natural, not synthetic, to be placed as either compost in a garden or help to grow stronger plants.

After reading Waste=Food for a second time, I am now reassured that my idea will be used as a biological metabolism as the fibers will continue to create nutrients that plants need over and over again as the material becomes part of the Earth. After reading the second article, C2CAD, I thought about what materials will nourish the Earth, and what materials need to be taken out of the mix so no harm will be done. Synthetic fibers, and some fibers that are dyed contain very harmful chemicals that will not benefit the plants. These certain fibers will need to be stripped from the fiber mix that once made up a garment. Laying the biodegradable natural fiber flat on the ground surrounding the plants will keep the weeds away and the fabric will eventually break down, causing the the fibers to become part of the Earth. This concept will not only provide the Earth with food, but will provide humans that grow the garden healthy and safe food.

UpCycling

Upcycling is a concept that I, before this week, had never really thought or heard of. When deciding what type of product to come up with that is upcycled, I began to brainstorm about my everyday life and my family's life. Over the past weekend, when I visited my nieces, they ravaged through my suitcase and played dress up with my clothes. Although they are only 4 and 7 years of age, and the garments swallowed them up, they still loved trying on everything I had in my bag. They always compliment me on the way I dress and make comments on how they wish they could wear clothing like mine. So, this week I came up with the idea of turning my old clothes, that I know longer wish to wear, into miniature clothing.

After reading Waste = Food, I learned the difference between a biological metabolism and a technical metabolism. They both inspired me to think of a products lifecycle differently and inspired me to brainstorm about how my lifestyle affects both of these concepts. Technical metabolism consists of a technical nutrient, which I believe is any material that can be turned into another material that is worth the same amount of value or more. By watching the video, Rhoner Textiles, I realized that clothing really is a service and is not really just about the tangible garment itself. The items continuously circulate into several life cycles, serving a greater purpose to people and their community.

With my idea, adult clothing can be worn until the owner no longer wishes to wear the garment ever again, then one or several garments can be cut and sewn into any desired style of children's clothing. Many random garments could be used in making a dress or use simply one t-shirt to make one or a couple pairs of shorts, depending on what size of clothing the child wears. Using this concept, less clothing would be wasted in making children's clothing that the young users wear out so quickly. Parents and other adults would have any easy way to dispose of their old clothing by either selling their garments to parents to use to make their child's clothing or using the old pieces to make new pieces for their own kids. Garment manufacturers would become involved with the new idea by having customers send in their old and unwanted clothing to their desired manufacturing company and trade or get a discount on their new clothing they order. The manufacturing company would then either make the old clothes into new children's garments, or sell and trade with other children's manufacturing clothing companies. Less time and money would be spent purchasing clothing that kids outgrow so quickly and more time to focus on family life for the individuals who re make the garments, and more time for manufacturers to focus on sustainability.

Reflection of the Earth

Reflecting the naturalness of the Earth in the future designs of the apparel industry is vital for the mental mode of rejuvenating the environment to take place. Perhaps the only way for consumers to open their eyes on the problems that they are causing is to have them wear clothing that reflects the way Earth should be and use to be. Kate Fletcher, in Chapter 6 of Local and Light, talks about biomimicry by using nature as a model to inspire solutions that could possibly solve human problems. The best solutions for improving the environment surround humans, yet most refuse to see the obvious around them. Humans have learned so much from nature, but I think people have lost or forgotten the basic concepts that nature has taught them.

In the previous blog I talked about making garments 100% biodegradable and made from recycled materials. With this concept and using materials sparingly, I would like to add on that the garments should reflect nature and the ones that are not made from recycled materials, should be made from 100% organic natural fibers. The articles of clothing will colored from natural dyes from seeds, flowers, fruits, vegetables, coffee beans, grass, etc. The organic fibers used in the fashion clothing will be made from cellulosic fibers such as hemp, organic cotton, flax, bamboo, jute, abaca and protein fibers that have been shaved from an animal humanely. Leather can be used but only if the skins from the meat packing industry, so they were not killed just for their fur and skin. To educate consumers on what they do to the environment and how purchasing this clothing line will benefit the Earth, I will make the tags on the garments indicate what materials are used in the making of the article of clothing and what percentage of improvement they are making for nature by wearing it. How to properly wash the garment will be included on the label. Washing the clothing using only natural soaps that do not contain harmful chemicals and minimal water possible will be included in the instructions. This will let us become back into balance with the biosphere, replacing what we have taken from the planet.

Produce for Recycling

Using waste as a resource is a concept that has been examined and used to find ways to re use materials for energy that would otherwise been thrown away. The downside on this concept is the fact that materials that are not used to be turned into energy do just end up in land fills and may sit without ever breaking down. The real problem is that products that are made to be recycled depend upon humans to actually initiate the hands-on recycling method and when people choose not to practice this, goods that are made to be recycled still end up in landfills. Designing all products for biodegradability is the solution for stopping waste and filling up land fills. Biodegradable products will be free of chemicals that preserve the products or garments from never degrading when they turn into waste. These textiles may be manufactured from recycled goods and natural fibers that do not emit harmful pollutants into the atmosphere.

In the reading How Will We Conduct Business, using waste as a resource inspired me to rethink the way just recycling products over and over again may not be the only answer. Eventually products will turn into waste regardless of how many times the product has been recycled and made into different products. Producing endless amounts of goods that are made from recycled goods is not perfectly efficient. Creating goods that are made to decompose after a certain amount of time and that can be made from recycled materials is a better solution that I believe is feasible in today's society and for the future. This would be more beneficial to the environment when people who are suppose to recycle materials do not. The Earth would not have to pay the burden of the harm a product that is not biodegradable but was suppose to be recycled causes.

Optimizing rather than maximizing is a key part in manufacturing and designing goods that are 100% biodegradable. Preserving energy and saving fossil fuels is what biodegradable products help do. They maximize precious resources for the long haul. Over half over manufactured items quickly just turn into waste. Biodegradable items that are recycled will continue to benefit the world, but the items that are unfortunately just thrown away will not hurt the Earth. The quality of the goods will long lasting for the time needed to use the good. When they item is not longer used, it can be recycled.

The Future I See

When I think about the future and the sustainability of the Earth's natural resources I am optimistic. I have difficulty imagining an Earth with limited resources, extinct animals, and a contaminated atmosphere. Realistically, people on our planet will continue to use precious resources excessively if governmental regulations are not put in to action, or perhaps people of the future will be able to re make and re place natural resources with man made resources. Most people are not willing to change their lifestyles unless their lives or lifestyles are threatened and changing the way they live is no longer just an option. I am a firm believer in governmental regulations when the topic is saving people from themselves and I believe this must be done to protect the future. When individuals make poor life decisions the cause is usually due to lack of understanding and knowledge of how their actions will effect themselves or others around them. An abundant of people do not understand the extreme severity of protecting the Earth's resources from depleting.


Society today has made life a contest on who can consume the most resources, in that excessive consumption equals success. Money hungry people are the ones who continue to consume and use resources like its going out of style because they just simply can. In the reading, The Futurist, a quote I found to be eye opening was " It would be hopelessly naive to believe that entire populations will suddenly experience a moral awakening, renouncing greed, envy and avarice." This quote makes me think about how impossible getting everyone to regulate the amount of resources they use is, even with government regulation. Those who are wealthy and desperate will always be able to buy their way out of laws and regulations that middle class people have to abide by. But although we may never live in a perfect world, saving the world from itself is something that can be done. In the article Thinking Ahead:  The Value of Future Consciousness, it states that "wisdom can also be described as being able to grasp the big picture of reality and use this knowledge for the betterment of life." I liked this quote because I do believe knowledge is power and should be used for the greater good, not evil. With government interference, people should be given the knowledge on how they are corroding the Earth, how to change positively, and how both ways could change their future for better or for worse. Government regulations should start with major corporations in teaching them how to grow, manufacture and distribute goods in an eco friendly way. In the article, Visioneering: an essential framework in sustainability science, it makes a good point, "The purpose of this note and comment is to help awaken the sleeping giants in our communities to envision a sus- tainable world and to fulfill it. Our objective is to re- emphasize  the significance of a clear vision and its engineering in sustainability science to move scientists and practitioners towards sustainability." This goes along with my belief of improving the manufacturers and wealthy investors who have the most control over the well being of the planet first and then the trickle down effect will play into the change as a whole. 

Miracle Fibers

The issue of growing hemp in the United States is constantly being argued over in politics and farming communities. The DEA law enforcement believes that hemp and marijuana are too alike and that from a helicopter, the two can not be differentiated. Although hemp and marijuana are cousins, hemp lacks the abundance amount of THC, the drug that gets people high, that marijuana contains and is grown for illegally. In the movie Hempsters, a law enforcing agent claims that growing the hemp plant will only send a bad message to children, and people will not be able to tell the difference when the plant is being grown. A counter argument that was made by a politician said," if a DEA agent can not tell the difference between the two plants, then he should not be in law enforcement." According the the reading, Hemp: The Historic Fiber Remains Controversial, hemp in textiles has been used since the 28th century B.C. and is still used a lot today in home furnishings and apparel. The process of growing the plant is much different than growing it's cousin, who requires an abundant amount of light and space to grow. Hemp can be grown extremely close together with less sunlight. Hemp is naturally resistant to mold, pests, and bacteria, so the pesticides and other harmful chemicals are not needed for growing. The entire plant can be used to make cloth, paper, building materials, cosmetics, and even food.

Hemp has been named the most eco friendly fiber and is known to be healthy to humans, so the question of why the fiber is illegal is what I am still trying to figure out. Why is it illegal to grow the fiber in the United States, which would generate profit, when we import the fiber from other countries? I believe the people who are against the fiber being grown in the United States are lacking information on why the fiber is so beneficiary and not hazardous. This plant, when legalized, will make an improvement in farming and trade which will keep outsourcing this fiber to a minimum.

Bamboo fiber has been mislabeled on garments and other products, when really the fiber is nothing but rayon. This often misleads people into believing that what they are buying is eco friendly and healthy. According to Are You Being Bamboozled?, mislabeling these products is illegal under the FTC regulations, but some companies find a way to continuously trick consumers. Rayon, made from bamboo, is not eco friendly because of all the toxic chemicals used in the process of making the fiber. The fiber is not bio degradable because they do not break down in a short amount of time after be disposed of.

GM Cotton Against Organic, demonstrates how many companies are misleading consumers into thinking the are being eco friendly and organic. "January 2010, large amounts of genetically modified (GM) cotton from India had been put on the German market as organic cotton. The report also questioned the authenticity of the organic certifiers Ecocert and the Dutch Control Union. According to the article, they are suspected of having certified GM cotton as organic.". This was a large scale of fraud that potentially scared away consumers from buying the products of this producer. "Today what are generally referred to as Third Party Certification systems have become the dominant means of organic guarantee for world trade. While Third Party Certification is an essential component to world trade, there are downsides to the system. The inherent expense and paperwork required in a multilevel system discourages most small organic producers from being certified at all. This limits local and domestic trade as well as access to organic products."

Many controversies still exist with all three of these fibers and may continually cause concerns in the near future. Hemp, bamboo, and organic cotton are miracle fibers when they are grown, treated, manufactured and labeled correctly to the public.

Sustainability of Cotton

Cotton, being the most popular fiber on the planet, has many perks but also many downfalls. While cotton itself may be somewhat sustainable, the abundances to which the plants are grown causes unsustainable impacts. Overuse of water and endangerment to animals are just a few negative impacts of growing the plant excessively. Using water to grow the cotton is unsustainable if the plant requires more water than the Earth can produce with rainfall and more than often this is the case. Pesticides have been known to stream into rivers and pollute the water that humans and animals often drink.

While reading The Sustainability of Cotton I found that there is cotton is not very sustainable at all. Organic farming is a positive alternative to being sustainable if the conditions of the workers and the surrounding environment are treated fairly. If a forest has to be cut down in order for farmers to plant organic cotton, that is not becoming sustainable. If workers are mistreated and use of child labor is happening on an organic cotton farm, that is not being sustainable either. Organic cotton still requires an abundant amount of water for growing. Mobile irrigation seems use the least amount of water but requires trees to be cut down. Flood irrigation does just that, flood. Drip irrigation is the most effectively sustainable way because the system only gives the plant exactly the amount of water needed and distributes at the root of the plant. However, less than 1% of cotton farming irrigation is done this way because of the high cost of the system.

Cotton Inc. is conducting tests and projects for cotton growing to become more economically friendly. Some of their projects include evaluating new pest-management technologies, changes in row spacing, planting patterns, plant populations, that may improve the way cotton is grown. In the Cotton and Water video, they claim to have found a way to use by far less water in farming and manufacturing cotton. Precision irrigation is what they are starting to use in which a pipe is ran underground to the plant's roots directly. Some scientists are also trying to make a cotton plant that lacks water drought genes so the plant will be resistant to drought. The goal is to make cotton plants that require half as much water which would have a major impact.

Natural vs. Synthetic

There has been a lot of controversy and confusion about the facts of natural fibers verses synthetic fibers. While both have their positive and negative aspects to them, they can also be made in a way to reduce the harm they cause to the environment. Large amounts of water, and harmful pesticides are used to grow cotton. Sheep are injected with insecticides which can be harmful to the flock if not treated properly. An abundant amount of energy and non renewable resources are made to produce synthetic fibers. For polyester, water consumption is extremely low, emissions from the chemicals to produce the fiber is fairly high if discharge is untreated. Producing nylon produces emissions of nitrous oxide, which has caused about 3% of the carbon dioxide emissions into the Earth's atmosphere. The production of viscose leads to emissions of sulphur, nitrous oxide, carbon disulphide, and hydrogen sulfide. These chemicals lead to harmful environmental conditions.  Harmful pollutants that contaminate water and breathing air are cause by both of these fibers when manufactured.

All fibers are capable of being manufactured in a proper way that will not cause harm to the environment. These processes are not always convenient and often require more money to be spent on processing. Cotton can be organically grown, or substituted for hemp or flax fibers. Wool can also be grown organically, and the chemicals used to treat the wool can be recycled instead of being thrown out where otherwise it would potentially seep into the dirt and water. When choosing polyester, make sure it has not been made with catalytic agents that contain cobalt or manganese salts. The only real alternative for Nylon is to substitute the fiber for wool. Viscose can be made from wood, can be treated without chlorine bleach, and can be substituted for lyocell. Hemp has been known to be the most environmentally friendly fiber.

For my designs, I would still choose synthetic fibers if they were my favorite. I would explain to my friend and others, the alternative choices for synthetic fibers that I will use. Using synthetic fibers like polyester that are recycled, viscose that has not been bleached with chlorine, and lyocell. I will teach them about the harmful affects that non organic fibers have on the environment to compare them to synthetic fibers that are not as bad. My designs from synthetic fibers will be made to wear for a long time and will not fall apart.

The negative effects of Fashion

As fashion continues to change and clothing becomes more affordable, the negative environmental impacts of this epidemic grows. Harmful pesticides, pollution, animal endangerment, non-biodegradable fibers,  and unhealthy working conditions are just a few dangerous aspects that the fashion industry has accumulated. Fashion Sustainability has suggested some solutions to these issues that I believe could catch on and in the long run, help save our planet. Sustainable production could be pursued by making new goods from renewable material, produce only organic cotton or fibers that do not contain harsh chemicals, and only allow animal skins/fur from the meat industry. If harmful chemicals are banned from t textiles productions, unhealthy working conditions will no longer be a problem. Sweat shops should be banned all together and should remain illegal. The disposal of garments should be pursued in terms of recycling, refurbishing, and biodegradability. Caring for a garment should be performed with little resources.
The Ecosystem Assessment correlates with Fashion Sustainability in the fact that both articles show how the ecosystems are dwindling due to the abundant amount of resources that are being abused. Flows of nitrogen in terrestrial ecosystems have doubled, and flows of phosphorous have tripled. More than half of all the synthetic nitrogen fertilizer, which was first manufactured in 1913, ever used on the planet, half has been used since 1985. This shows that as ready to wear apparel availability grows, harmful waste is being produced along with it. Ecosystem Assessment suggests effective responses for specific sectors. For agriculture, removal of production subsidies that have adverse economic, social and environmental effects. Investment in agricultural science and technology that can sustain the increase of food supply without harmful tradeoffs involving excessive use of water, nutrients and pesticides.
The Fashion Sustainability article suggests many valuable eco friendly changes that could potentially change the way consumers go about buying, caring, and disposing of their garments. This resource gives a narrow spectrum of how these changes should be made and does not go into what the costs may be when making such restrictively narrow changes. Ecosystem Assessment provides a much broader view on how the environment could be positively changed and gives an explanation on how these changes will affect the cost of goods and how that could possibly turn negative.

Give back more than you take

A New Green History of the World by Clive Ponting, is the story of Easter Island, which is a prime example of the dependence of human communities on their environment and the devastating consequences of not giving back what they take from the environment. The first polynesian settlers came sometime in the fifth century and discovered quickly that the island contained a scarce amount of resources. The people were restricted to a small diet of sweet potatoes and chicken due to the climate which left them with an abundant amount of free time. Closely related households formed clans with a chief leader to distribute food and form activities and each had its own place for religious practices. The society became one the the most advanced and complex community in Polynesian history. As the population of humans grew, the lack of resources dwindled. Trees were cut down for agriculture purposes, fuel for heating and cooking, shelter construction, building canoes and for transporting elaborate stone statues across the island for religious clan purposes. As the trees disappeared, underground homes were having to be made, canoes were no longer available, and the crop growing soil became eroded and lacked nutrients. Clans began fighting over the reason for the lack of resources which led to a war break out. Lacking in protein, people resorted to cannibalism which led to extinction. 


Planet Earth as a whole, faces similar problems as did the people of Easter Island, however we are now capable of reversing the  damage humans have done. The Earth is slowly eliminating resources needed to survive due to unnecessary societal demands. People on Earth have no escape after resources run out like the people of Easter Island. For the luxury of living  frivolously, humans are polluting the atmosphere/oceans and deforesting, which both then lead to animal extinction, soil erosion, contaminated water, all of which are vital means of survival. I believe we are able to reverse this epidemic if everyone on Earth gives back to their ecosystem more than they take from it. According to The Millennium Ecosystem Panel, the changes that have been made in the ecosystems have contributed to substantial net gains for the well being of humans and economic development. The achievements have been made only through the sacrifice of the degradation of many ecosystem services, increased risk of non linear change and increase of poverty. Unless these problems are addressed, they will substantially diminish the benefits that these ecosystems obtain for future generations. 


According to www.ourcivilisation.com, air pollution has been falling in modern industrialized countries for the last 40 years, and it has been falling precisely because of economic growth and improvements in technology. Even in Los Angeles, which has the worst smog in the United States, air pollution levels have fallen by about half in the last 25 year and that is at a time when the area's population has doubled and its economy has tripled. I believe that this is a great counterargument to global warming, however I also believe that the statement shows that there was a problem but advanced technology has helped reverse potential harmful pollution.